"Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GNATS (bugs.apache.org), in short, sucks (that's an understatement).
> All I want is a usable web interface to manage our bugs. I have
> spent way too much time over the last few weeks fighting this
> horrible bug system and trying to clean up the entries.
>
> So, who among those who would go through the bugs would veto the use
> of bugzilla? It may be crap, but I believe less so than GNATS. Pier
> already has bugzilla setup on nagoya, so it should be fairly trivial
> to add an httpd-2.0 project.
>
> Please don't tell me that bugzilla is insecure - it's already being
> used by the ASF - adding one more project isn't going to introduce
> any new holes. And, it may just make it so that mere mortals can
> triage the bugs that we need to address before 2.0 GA.
>
> Try to query via the website based on arrival-date. You can't.
> GNATS is completely useless. If we don't use bugzilla, I'd recommend
> just taking down GNATS as it is inherently unmanagable. Note that
> we have 2,365 OPEN PRs in GNATS right now. There just isn't a way
> to sort through these with this tool. -- justin
I'm all +1 on that, I mean, Buzilla sucks but it's better than GNATS, and
regarding security, the whole kit is run in a chrooted environment on a
machine not hosting any critical server (plus it's backed up and yada yada
yada...)...
Adding HTTP/2.0 and APR is trivial...
Pier
