On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Wouldn't just making ap_log_error() ap_run_log_error() solve a lot of > these problems? +1 - with perhaps something like an 'always pass through'. I.e. even if an module provides an 'OK' it continues just as a 'DECLINE' so that certain major failures can be detected reliable enough - and shared among constituents. Otherwise one gets the 'log' the 'logger' problem. Or it may be that there is _core_ config directive which singles out one or more modules as 'allowed' to claim the log_error() stream with an OK - but have this right normaly reserved to core. Dw
