> > > What would be most cool is to set an r->replace_request member to >the > > > subrequest we will run. Then in the run request phase, look at > > > replace_request and run the insert_filters/run_handler against that > > > replacement. > > > > That could be goodness. I agree that I'm not sure if it is really > > that trivial. Perhaps. Well, actually, I know it won't be since > > some filters do different things when r->main is set. I can see > > rbb saying, "Those filters are broken." Is that the case? -- justin > >No that isn't the case, and the fix isn't that trivial. It isn't >impossible, but it adds an if to every single hook call.
Or would it... your griping about it [both of you] suddenly sparked some insight... if the return code is != 0 then we test the various cases. The mainline OK case remains unhindered :) Bill
