William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Isn't "Apache" implicit? I suspect "HTTP Server" is the easiest entry > (or HTTP 1.3 Server/HTTP 2.0 Server). httpd implies you are running > on a unix-derivate, Win32 or Netware users might be somewhat lost. > > otoh, HTTP Server could be misinterpreted as the standalone Jakarta > which would not be pretty. Perhaps Pier was right, Apache itself says > a ton. If we populate a component list under Apache that tells the > rest of the story, nobody would be confused.
Right. The name definitely must have Apache, since everyone outside the ASF (and many inside it) refer to it that way. "Apache HTTP" would be fine with me. > > What about core, the whole list worth of modules, apr and apr-util, > pcre and xml as Bugzilla "Components"? Yes, we need the component list filled in. At least the "categories" from the old gnats database would be a start. The other thing that needs to be done "soon" is to modify the default page under http://bugs.apache.org/ to at least reference the other database. Otherwise, both databases will continue to get reports. Joshua.
