Jim Jagielski wrote: > At 10:28 AM +0800 3/27/02, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Is there anything wrong with this patch? Thanks. >> > > > Nothing that I can see... I just don't see the need. We assume that > knowledge of the virtual host implies knowledge of the IP address > and port. We don't place the IP address of IP-based vhosts in the > 'board.
When you look at the output of mod_status (or Apache::VMonitor, the perl brother of mod_status) you cannot tell one port based vhost from another. Users ask me to present this info in Apache::VMonitor, because they want to tell one vhost from another in the output, but I cannot help them if the scoreboard doesn't have this info. As for IP addresses, why not adding these too in parallel with ports? After all mod_status is for showing the status of the server, why not showing information that's useful and essential to users of this module? Thanks. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
