Cliff Woolley wrote:
>On 29 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> - while (*path && *(path+1) != '/')
>> + while (*path && (*path != '/')) {
>> + ++path;
>> + }
>> + if (*path == '/') {
>> ++path;
>> + }
>>
>
>Alternatively:
>
>while (*path && *(path++) != '/')
> continue;
>
Ah, that's much better. I'll switch to this single-loop
form (plus a comment to explain what it's doing, because
the subtlety of the original version's postincrement logic
led to bugs in both the original code and the first attempt
at a fix).
--Brian
