At 09:39 PM 3/31/2002, you wrote: >On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 09:09:52PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > I don't expect us to 'measure' 2.0.34 against perchild, only worker > > and threaded mpms [and win32, netware specific mpms.] As long as > > the changes to server/mpm/perchild are finished when we are ready > > to roll (probably tomorrow evening, giving folks a chance to test the > > APACHE_2_0_34 tag and uncover any issues, as Jerry Baker has > > already done) then I'm fine with including those changes. > >Do we plan to test out 2.0.34 on daedalus before rolling? -- justin
I'm not concerned about the 3 day test - only for declaring this a 'beta'. Even if it's alpha quality - I'd like to know that APACHE_2_0_34 builds and runs under as many configs as possible over the next day so we can roll tarballs tomorrow night. And once it survives the daedalus stress test we should be all set for a pretty thorough beta. Things finally look quite stable, development wise, and we have a few folks interested in exploring those 'deferred for 2.1/3.0' sorts of features. Not that 2.0 bugfixing should come to some abrupt halt - only that 2.0 should become a stable tree, and new growth should start occuring on 2.1/3.0 type trees, depending on how radical the surgery that's required. Bill
