On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:58:11PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > The core can't do anything about it. If you are creating a > sub-request, > > > you must flush the data. > > > > Bing! > > > > ANY filter inserted by the subreq could be holding content. The > subrequest > > definitely MUST flush out its filter stack before going away. > > > > Yes, old_write buffers, and if that is "attached" to the subrequest, > then > > it > > must be flushed. But it really isn't about old_write. > > We aren't talking about the sub-request flushing its buffers at the end > of the request. That happens automatically, because the sub-request > must send an EOS.
Right. And ignore my comment about the new bucket type for a subreq ending. I forgot about the EOS thing. > We are talking about the main request flushing its > buffers before it runs the request. Um. How'd the buffers get filled before running the request? Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
