I'm -1 for RTC until we have a CTR development branch (2.1 or whatnot), and I don't think we should branch for at least a few more revs of 2.0 GA. In my mind we alrady require public review for any big changes or new features, so switching to RTC means that we are nearing the end of the lifecycle of a release.
that's my 2c, -aaron On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:38:40PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > I don't know how strongly I feel about this, but I think we > deserve to discuss this now that we have a GA. > > Should at some point we switch httpd-2.0 to a Review-then-Commit > model? If so, when? If not, why not? > > I guess I'm scared that someone will start adding things that > will destabilize the server without having it appropriately > reviewed *before* committing. > > I'm not going to go on a crusade for this, but I will mention > it so that we can discuss it. -- justin
