Guys, this is a SOURCE tarball. We don't need to provide every possible software combination for source tarballs. If one of our users requires a specific version of libtool, then they can install that version. If it is a binary install, then we have to use a specific version.
If you try to do this for every version, we'll have hundreds of tarballs for every release. Ryan ---------------------------------------------- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA > -----Original Message----- > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe critical OS- > specific requirements > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > According to Jeff, AIX needs this too. > > Hrm... musta missed that. Sorry Jeff. > > > I've got it here for now: > > > > http://www.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/2.0.35/httpd-2.0.35-libtool- > 142.tar.gz > > http://www.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/2.0.35/httpd-2.0.35-libtool- > 142.tar.gz.asc > > Like I said, I'm not against this in principle. But I think we need a > more obvious naming convention. (How many of those among our users, after > all, would know anything about various versions of libtool, or even what > libtool does for that matter?) > > We could go with Aaron's -darwin-src.tar.gz idea and symlink > -aix-src.tar.gz to it, but then that is only managable if the list of ... > uncooperative ... libtool/platform combinations is small. > > PS: Is there a simple patch for libtool 1.3.5 to make it work on AIX? If > we could just get ourselves a (sufficiently patched) version of libtool on > icarus that worked on all these platforms, we'd save ourselves a lot of > headache I think. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charlottesville, VA >
