Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:45:58PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote: > > > But this requires a user-installed patch upon a user-installed libtool. I'm > > > in favour of the first option. > > > > All of these options suck since they can't use any of the default > > libtools. I've got a tarball of 2.0.35 that I've rolled on > > moof.apache.org that is based off of wsanchez's libtool 1.4.2. > > > > I'll place it somewhere once I get my gpg key off of one of my > > other machines. If we want, we can place it in /dist, > > What is the license? If it is GPL or LGPL, we cannot/should not distribute it. >
We should encourage Apple to provide a working glibtool, and maybe just maybe get the libtool developers to listen and incorporate our patches into the official distro. By the by, I download Pier's latest libtool and it is functionally equiv to what I use. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
