> Please let's not get in any hurry replacing worker with this. worker > has problems but it is good enough to ship, and I'd rather see > incremental improvements to it since what we need now (IMO) is the > ability to get new GA releases out the door fairly quickly as our user > base ramps up and we fix problems that they discover. MPM redesigns > have always required a long shake-out period in the past. I don't > expect that this would be any different. > > I think it would be fine to add another MPM, and as people gain > confidence in it more people will use it and it may become appropriate > to zap worker down the road (maybe not much further down the road; I > dunno). > > -- > Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Born in Roswell... married an alien...
I agree with Jeff on all points. Bill
