http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/417/2000/2/200/3308893/
This has been the historic reason for not doing it. Ryan ---------------------------------------------- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: MPM as DSO? > > Aaron and I were talking over lunch yesterday and we were trying > to remember why MPM can't be DSOs. What is the obstacle here? > The MPMs are internally modules, but they currently require a > recompile to change your MPM. I'd like to change it so that they > are now available as DSOs instead. Is this feasable? > > Obviously, as long as APR is threaded, prefork and worker should be > interchangable. If your APR isn't threadable, you can't use a > threaded MPM. This also gives us an advantage by building all > of the MPMs and making it easier to live with binbuilds. -- justin
