What Brian describes is a fatal flaw in the current Worker MPM code.
In order to veto his change, you will be expected to review the code
first and then propose a better solution.  Until then, choose a better
way than -1 to make reservations.

If Brian needs to create a new MPM to fix this kind of problem, then
I will remove the worker MPM from the code base as soon as the new one
is committed.  I don't believe in leaving code in httpd that is not
robust enough for normal use.

....Roy

On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:51  PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:51:29PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
>> ...
>
> Having not read or reviewed this patch, I must say that I'm -1
> for replacing the worker MPM, but I'm fully in favor of adding
> a new MPM with these new features.
>
> That said, I'll review this patch tomorrow, :)
> -aaron
>

Reply via email to