Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > C-L invalid when using SSI DirectoryIndex: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7966 > > We've got three people on Bugzilla who are seeing this bug. Is > anyone available to look at this? This seems related to the > issues that were being addressed right as we shipped. I wonder > if this snuck in or something. -- justin
hmmm, that puzzles me. I see very accurate C-L headers on normal SSIs (but bogus Content-Range headers). I haven't tried SSIs on DirectoryIndexes, but don't know why that should confuse it. There isn't a C-L header when I do autoindexes. Greg [gregames@gandalf netcat]$ cat cyg.br0 HEAD /docs/cygwin.html HTTP/1.1 Host: httpd.apache.org Range: bytes=0- [gregames@gandalf netcat]$ nc apache.org 80 < cyg.br0 HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:44:23 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.35 (Unix) Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Range: bytes 0-20418/20419 Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 20603 [gregames@daedalus docs]$ ls -l cygwin* header* footer* -rw-r--r-- 1 rbowen httpd 20419 Oct 7 2001 cygwin.html -rw-r--r-- 1 rbowen httpd 123 Oct 7 2001 footer.html -rw-r--r-- 1 rbowen httpd 137 Oct 7 2001 header.html the two #include virtual tags are 38 bytes long each.
