On 12 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > jwoolley 02/04/12 11:02:10 > > Modified: build httpd_roll_release > Log: > * make sure the -alpha name is not _inside_ the gzip (I have to try this and > to see if it works that way though) > > -tar cvf $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar $WORKING_DIR >> $LOG_NAME > -cp -p $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar x$WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar > -gzip -9 $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar > -mv x$WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar > -compress $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar > +tar cvf $WORKING_DIR.tar $WORKING_DIR >> $LOG_NAME > +cp -p $WORKING_DIR.tar x$WORKING_DIR.tar > +gzip -9 $WORKING_DIR.tar > +mv $WORKING_DIR.tar.gz $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar.gz > +mv x$WORKING_DIR.tar $WORKING_DIR.tar > +compress $WORKING_DIR.tar > +mv $WORKING_DIR.tar.Z $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar.Z
No, these two give exactly the same result, as I originally thought they would. So I admit to having no idea why we had to reroll 2.0.35 to get rid of an -alpha inside the tarball... where was it? Not on the directory name... --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
