"Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > In other words, this isn't even remotely HTTP/1.1 compliant right now. > I suspect the same is true of the proxy code.
Quite possibly - but I want to get 1.3's 100-continue support approved
and committed before I start hammering at 2.0...
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
