> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
> Sent: 13 April 2002 02:44
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Since this might be an apxs issue I'm forwarding this here.
> > Any clues?
>
> Well, we (I) started using instdso.sh instead of libtool --install
> because with libtool --install
>
> 1) what the user has to code with LoadModule to get mod_foo loaded
> varies between operating systems and libtool versions
>
> 2) we get a bunch of crap installed in the lib directory that we don't
> need
>
> Obviously somebody found a drawback to this bit of libtool-avoidance.
>
> :( :( :(
Yes, and we should fix it.
This patch works for me. Not an expert on libtool, so I'd like some feedback.
Sander
--- instdso.sh.old Wed Feb 20 21:11:32 2002
+++ instdso.sh Sun Apr 14 13:00:25 2002
@@ -5,8 +5,9 @@
# we use this instead of libtool --install because:
# 1) on a few platforms libtool doesn't install DSOs exactly like we'd
# want (weird names, doesn't remove DSO first)
-# 2) we never want the .la files copied, so we might as well copy
-# the .so files ourselves
+# 2) we never want the .la files copied, so we remove them after
+# libtool has installed them. We need to use libtool to make
+# the installed dsos relink properly.
if test "$#" != "3"; then
echo "wrong number of arguments to instdso.sh"
@@ -49,7 +50,10 @@
$CMD || exit $?
;;
*)
- CMD="cp .libs/$TARGET_NAME $TARGETDIR/$TARGET_NAME"
+ CMD="$SH_LIBTOOL --mode=install cp $DSOARCHIVE $TARGETDIR/"
+ echo $CMD
+ $CMD || exit $?
+ CMD="rm -f $TARGETDIR/$DSOBASE.a $TARGETDIR/$DSOBASE.la"
echo $CMD
$CMD || exit $?
;;
