At 07:51 AM 4/17/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: >I have my doubts about this but I don't have a better suggestion... If you >have tested >this on Win2k/NT, lets give it a shot...
Well... early reports indicate some success. Go figure. I'll continue to watch for feedback from testers. > > I was reading this error from the umpteenth news poster about 2.0.35 > Win2000 > > failure... > > > > I have the same problem in installing Apache 2.0.35 on WIndows XP: > > [Tue Apr 16 20:39:08 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2628 > > [Tue Apr 16 20:39:08 2002] [notice] Child 2628: Child process is > > running > > [Tue Apr 16 20:39:09 2002] [crit] (32538)An operation was attempted on > > something that is not a socket. : Parent: WSADuplicateSocket failed > > for socket 3308280. > > Check the FAQ. > > > > It occured to me that maybe - if we maintain the handle identity - it might > > overcome the "Not a socket" error. > > > > Attached is a patch that doesn't change the socket HANDLE. Any > > objections to at least attempting this? > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >
