Never mind, just saw the second message. Ryan
---------------------------------------------- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [patch] small perchild fixes > > I didn't get the patch, can you re-send it? Please put the patch > inline. > > Thanks, > > Ryan > > ---------------------------------------------- > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > San Francisco, CA > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:47 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [patch] small perchild fixes > > > > I've attached a small patch to perchild that > > > > - makes perchild compile with the server/mpm/perchild -> > > server/mpm/experimental/perchild move. > > - fixes a typo I made in an earlier patch. It ran the GID through the > user > > name lookup. (I didn't notice because on my test syste the uid, gid, > > username, and group name were all the same.) oops. > > > > Please apply. > > > > (It doesn't address the larger problem that perchild just didn't work > for > > me, requests hung. rbb's last commit message to mpm.h suggests this > is > > not > > unexpected. Since I know nothing of either the old or new locking > APIs, > > I'll > > leave that alone.) > > > > -- > > Scott Lamb
