Sorry for the late response. On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 18:05, Brian Pane wrote: > Austin Gonyou wrote: > ... > >Given that info, is there a way to do: ... > Since the switch from mutexes to atomic ops on leader/follower, I'm > seeing slightly lower mean response times (on par with worker and > prefork). The CPU utilization hasn't dropped, but it's still > competitive > with prefork. > > >The main reason I'm asking is that if worker is to be replaced, then > how > >much longer will it be till Apache 2.0, on *nix is really ready to rock > >with a threaded model? > > > > Performance-wise, I think leader/follower might be there already (based > on its performance compared to prefork). But it needs more testing. > On this point, what is the possibility of leader/follower having another issue like worker. 25 is ok, 26 is not? (max threads)
I'm only curious because I never ran into it, wasn't trying to, but I also run about 50 forks with 20-25 threads max. So I probably never would've hit the problem to begin with. Anyway..TIA. > --Brian > -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it." Latin Proverb
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
