> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > We have the exact same issue with mod_cache > > (mod_mem_cache/mod_disk_cache). What do you think about hiding the load > > of the protocol modules behind a config directive? > > I don't have a conceptual problem with that, though it would mean > hardcoding the path to the DSO, right?
I haven't given much thought about how to implement this. Could we make the assumption that the protocol modules are in the same location as mod_proxy? Bill
