On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:18:58AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > How about using APR condition variables instead of yield()? That was > how I was imagining implementing this. The listener would block > until the queue is not full and then drop into the accept mutex > rotation. I seem to remember something like this being in the > original worker code, but I don't recall. -- justin
Yes, using cond vars is the correct way to do this. I committed the LIFO->FIFO change this morning and added a counter to keep track of the number of elements in the queue. That can be used in a new function that blocks until the queue is non-full. -aaron
