> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 27 April 2002 09:34
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:36:45PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > Fine, if that's your argument. (And, I've been thinking of doing > > this before.) > > > > So, we should switch apr_pcalloc to fix this rather than avoid the > > problem. If we fix the problem, all of the code magically gets > > optimized rather than having to work around people trying to > > be cute. -- justin > > This is why I don't use calloc() anymore: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02492.html The performance prob goes away when we make apr_pcalloc into a macro. Sander.
