Damn...this is getting close. It's getting there it looks like. I can't help but think the final outcome might be a choice of worker OR leader/follower. I'll take a hit in the CPU to have closer avg load between worker and leader/follower as well as the requests/sec being what they are.
Ohh..if only.. :) On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 23:02, Brian Pane wrote: > > With a single listener port (I'll run multi-listener tests later > today), > > > > MPM Requests Mean resp. CPU CPU > > type per second time (ms) load utilization > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > worker 1250 37.4 6.1 65% > > leader 1175 40.0 5.6 61% > > threadpool 1012 47.1 4.2 47% > > with two listeners, > > MPM Requests Mean resp. CPU CPU > type per second time (ms) load utilization > ------------------------------------------------------ > worker 1071 44.3 4.1 51% > leader 964 49.4 3.9 46% > threadpool 997 47.8 3.9 46% > > > -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it." Latin Proverb
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
