> > It looks like you picked up practically all the changes. Why not just > > retag 2.0.37?
I'm +1 for this... > You mean, tag HEAD as 2.0.37? > I didn't want to do that since there were changes I didn't want in there. > Practically all the changes is just about right ;) Well then why are the patches in the tree??? I'm not sure I like the idea of tagging and then tagging just some files. Seems like if we haven't got a stable HEAD we shouldn't be tagging. We got into this whole business of tagging often as a way of avoiding having this sort of thing. Ifw e tagged and it wasn't stable, who cares. Just retag when it is and move on... This seems to be a growing trend and one I think we should stop. david
