> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 April 2002 23:42
>> I'd like to see either the seperate version for ab >> patch reverted _or_ ab moved out of the tree. I >> feel very strongly about only having 'one'* version >> scheme to care about in the httpd tree. > > +0 to move it out of the tree. > > +0 to restore the 1.3 versioning situation. > > -1 on anything which > -> shows in the output of AB of versions of AB which -can- > be compared different version numbers > or > -> which shows in the output of AB identical version numbers > even though the results cannot be compared. This double veto* implies that it must be 'just right'. This is incredibly restrictive and I'm not even sure it will hold. If we expose the apr version# that will only mean that ab versions are dependend on apr versions instead of httpd versions. Giving ab its own versioning scheme (ie, not include the apr/httpd version number) is a bad call IMO. That will require apr developers to bump the version of ab when they touch anything used in ab (not cool). > if the above implies moving out of the tree; then +1 for that. If the > above can be accomplished by having the APR version # exposed or something > simpler - great. Otherwise - move it out. Well, I'm -1 on the current situation. I have the feeling most people want to keep ab in the tree, which implies reverting the change. Sander *) The second one is a given. That's what we had; we always had different version numbers.
