On 1 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > In any case, +1 on the patch. Worker won't be perfect, but at least > > it will be better than 2.0.35. > > I just committed it. I'd love to get some feedback from other Linux > users before a roll, though.
It shuts down, but ouch, is it nasty: [Wed May 01 14:52:26 2002] [warn] child process 11253 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Wed May 01 14:52:26 2002] [warn] child process 11254 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Wed May 01 14:52:26 2002] [warn] child process 11253 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Wed May 01 14:52:26 2002] [warn] child process 11254 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Wed May 01 14:52:28 2002] [warn] child process 11253 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Wed May 01 14:52:28 2002] [warn] child process 11254 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Wed May 01 14:52:32 2002] [error] child process 11253 still did not exit, sending a SIGKILL [Wed May 01 14:52:32 2002] [error] child process 11254 still did not exit, sending a SIGKILL [Wed May 01 14:52:49 2002] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down Note: as soon as I told it to stop, my big download *did* get stopped. But the process just sat there until it got the SIGKILL, at which point it was a zombie until the parent shut down a few seconds later. :-/ --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
