+1 2.0.36 is better, plain and simple :)
Cliff Woolley wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Greg Ames wrote: > > > ...and no emails reporting strange behavior on the site. +1 for beta. > > +1 for beta from me as well. > > > What about GA? > > IMO: > > pros: > * we do people more of a disservice by continue to have them use 2.0.35 > and find already fixed bugs than by throwing another release at them > three weeks later > * what you said > > cons: > * worker shutdown is still wonky, at least on linux. part of me would > have rather seen it segfault. but just stick a warning in the release > notes to be wary of the potential rough edges there, and I'm okay with > it > > --Cliff > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charlottesville, VA > > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
