Re: [Patch] Concept: have MPM identify itself in Server header

[Ian Holsman]

Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> 
> 
>>Ok, but as far as I am concerned something like PHP, mod_dav, mod_perl,
>>etc. are also server implementation details that do not belong in this
>>header.  Unless I misunderstood Roy's message.  I don't see much of a
>>difference between announcing PHP there and an MPM.
> 
> 
> Possibly.  I guess I draw the line by saying that it's okay to announce
> version numbers, but configuration parameters are out.  I don't have so
> much of a problem with third-party modules announcing themselves.
> mod_ssl and OpenSSL I find questionable at this point, however.  <shrug>

On this note
what do people think in making the 'default' install only show the major 
version (ie.. Apache 2.0) instead of showing everything?

> 
> --Cliff
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>    Cliff Woolley
>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    Charlottesville, VA
> 
>