> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30 May 2002 02:41
[...] > > Log: > > Catch up with the apr_allocator_set_owner -> apr_allocator_owner_set renames > > in APR. > > This requires an MMN bump (which is fine with me, since we've already done > one in 2.0.37-dev, and I'm starting to see little point in going back > now). If there are other renames of this sort, we should get them in all > at once. What about these: apr_pool_set_abort apr_pool_get_abort apr_pool_get_parent And the ones left in renames_pending? Also, Thom May posted a long list of suggestions a while back. Noone seems to have responded to that. Sander
