On 30 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>   +
>   +    * 413 (invalid chunk size) followed by another request segfaults.
>   +      Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   +      Status: Justin is completely confounded by this.  It looks like a
>   +              bucket lifetime bug, but somehow an operation on one
>   +              brigade is altering another brigade and corrupting it.

Ouch.  I'll take a peek.  Your lifetime guess is probably a good one.
I'd think that most likely what's happening is that a bucket (or a bucket
buffer) is getting freed but still being used afterward; the bucket
freelists would reassign that storage thereby making it easy for the first
to corrupt the second.  Can you give me an exact sequence of requests to
duplicate this?

--Cliff

Reply via email to