Thom May wrote: >Mostly because I've been running threadpool for a while and the lack of this >support was getting annoying. >Cheers, >-Thom > >
I've actually been thinking that it's time to remove threadpool and leader/follower, because all the improvements that we developed in those experimental MPMs have been incorporated into worker as of 2.0.37. But if you have a setup in which threadpool works well but worker doesn't, then it may be premature to remove threadpool (and I'll commit the -k patch for threadpool). Is worker (from the current CVS head) a viable alternative to threadpool for your purposes? Thanks, --Brian
