On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 07:20:59AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1.50 +5 -5 httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_userdir.c
>
> Index: mod_userdir.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_userdir.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.49
> retrieving revision 1.50
> diff -u -r1.49 -r1.50
> --- mod_userdir.c 31 May 2002 16:59:13 -0000 1.49
> +++ mod_userdir.c 15 Jun 2002 07:20:59 -0000 1.50
> @@ -347,12 +347,12 @@
> r->pool)) == APR_SUCCESS
> || rv == APR_INCOMPLETE))) {
> r->filename = apr_pstrcat(r->pool, filename, dname, NULL);
> - /* XXX: Does this walk us around FollowSymLink rules?
> + /* XXX: Does this walk us around FollowSymLink rules?
> * When statbuf contains info on r->filename we can save a syscall
> - * by copying it to r->finfo
> - */
> - if (*userdirs && dname[0] == 0)
> - r->finfo = statbuf;
> + * by copying it to r->finfo
> + */
> + if (*userdirs && dname[0] == 0)
> + r->finfo = statbuf;
>
> /* For use in the get_suexec_identity phase */
> apr_table_setn(r->notes, "mod_userdir_user", w);
Is this anything more than an intentation change, and if so did you mean
to include it in the same commit with the shtml AddType fix?
-aaron
