Re: Linux and the worker model

[Jean-Jacques Clar]

I built with the default configuration first (no mpm switch), then using the worker mpm. That was the mistake. The define for AP_MPM_USES_POD was probably still alive in my console.   Building using the mpm switch for worker model first works fine.   Thanks,   JJ >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/02 11:54AM >>> They should both be there.  The version in mpm_common is for MOST mpms, but worker uses a different set of functions.  If you worker MPM headers are actually defining AP_MPM_USES_POD, then there is a problem with the source.  The version in CVS does not define this for worker. Ryan On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: > I am building 2.0.39, but it was the same thing with 2.0.35. > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/02 10:26AM >>> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:09:45AM -0600, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: > > There are errors when building 2.0.x on Linux RH7.3 with the worker > > Which version of 2.0 exactly? > > -aaron > -- _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom                            [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------