Cliff Woolley wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> > I believe so.  Our current implementation supports it.  -- justin
> 
> Does 1.3's now that we've changed it?
> 

Yes, it still works, though mostly it's because we '%ld' the value
in the table. ;) I was just walking through what could happen if,
in some way, the value in the table was something like "123 " or so.
That does not look possible, but if it *does* happen, then our current
code will see that as a bad request (the (endptr && *endptr) test).
Not a problem, but a point to keep in mind.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Reply via email to