> Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > Playing devil's advocate :-) mod_status and mod_info should NOT be loaded by >default. > > > > Agreed! Wouldn't this change set things up so that if someone does > a compile with mod_status and mod_info included, the resultant > config file would make them active? That was my understanding. > If not, then, well... (in my best Emily Latella voice)... "never mind" :) >
You're right. If mod_status and mod_info are compiled in, this change would make them active. Not good. I am also a fan of minimalist config files. Bill
