Bill Stoddard wrote: >>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >> >> >>>At 12:18 PM 7/9/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>I'm going to do a start the T&R process on thursday for a 2.0.40 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>release >>>> >>>> >>>>>so if you've got things which you want in there and are stable >>>>>(apr_poll) comes to mind please commit them. >>>>> >>>>>Ian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I'll try to run a profile on the new apr_poll code posted by Ryan this >>>>afternoon or evening. It would be -really- good if we could make the >>>>apr_time changes before 2.0.40... >>>> >>>> >>>Agreed. They are in or out. BPane... any new news on profiling with >>>busec values? >>> >>> >>No news; I don't expect that I'll be able to work on this >>for a while. >> >>--Brian >> >> > >Where and when was the post that described this proposal? I'd like to take >a look. Is there a patch? > There's no patch that I know of, but here's the thread with wrowe's original proposal for the binary microseconds design: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102376298728487&w=2 With the big batch of changes that I made last week, almost all of the time-related code in the httpd now uses the new macros-- apr_time_sec(), apr_time_usec(), etc--instead of multiplying and dividing by 1,000,000 directly. Hopefully that will make it easier to try out a new time representation. --Brian
