Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > questions for *dbm gurus... is a switch from 1.3's ndbm usage to > > apr-util's built-in sdbm going to hurt anybody (file compatibility)? > > > It will. > but the easiest way to handle this is to support ndbm in apr-util. > I've got a patch from someone to do this.. I've just been lazy > I'll go and implement that now. > (so you'll have the best of both worlds)
Cool... I think I should change my mod_rewrite patch to do something like the following: #if APU_HAVE_NDBM #define DBM_MAP_TYPE "NDBM" #else #define DBM_MAP_TYPE "SDBM" #endif Then, we are compatible with existing (1.3) map files where possible and we allow everyone else to use the support too. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
