Hi - Shouldn't a new thread be spawned for an(other) ldap vote (its deja vu all over again :)
sterling >-- Original Message -- >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:20:05 -0600 >From: "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: authentication rewrite > > >+1 > >Brad Nicholes >Senior Software Engineer >Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions >http://www.novell.com > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:20:43 AM >>> >Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >> Ideally, you could use the LDAP filters that most PAM >implementations >> use, but definitely allow the user to tweak them. I'd like to get >> mod_auth_ldap ported to this, and if we move towards a >provider-based >> system, I think mod_auth_ldap should be moved back into the core. >> (Namely because that's the preferred auth for DAV ACL support as it >> is hierarchical.) > >I want to see auth_ldap moved into experimental so that it is included > >in any work done on overhauling the auth stuff. > >Currently the code is receiving minimal exposure where it is. > >Regards, >Graham >-- >----------------------------------------- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "There's a moon > over Bourbon Street > tonight..." >
