At 11:27 AM 9/6/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: >Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:55:17AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > Though we probably don't want to be in the business of pretending to > > > support C++ modules in general, they certainly work with Apache on > > > some platforms and we could at least make it simple for the user to > > > specify the command to invoke to link httpd. This would default to > > > the C compiler, but could be forced by the user to be g++ or aCC or > > > whatever. > > > > > > ????? --with-httpd-linker=g++ ????? > > > > LD=g++ ./configure ... ?? > >definitely a more appropriate user interface, though it seems optimal >not to bring any C++ rtl init/term logic into ab, htpasswd, and >friends since it would only be necessary for httpd > > > (I wondered why this didn't Just Work last time I tried it a few > > months ago, and stuck it on my todo list to fix it...) > >rules.mk is why it doesn't Just Work :) > >LINK = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(COMPILE) $(LT_LDFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) >-o $@
Doesn't an option --c-plus-plus make more sense than a platform specific link foo option? Shouldn't we just extend libtool to deal with the platform specifics, g++ or whatnot, depending on what's required to support stl and other specifics? Bill
