Erik Abele wrote:
If you look at the actual links, you'll see I'm pretty much forcing people to download from the mirrors. I provide direct links only to the mirrors. I do provide a link to the main site at the top, but I think most people will take the direct links.+1. great idea, but I think the mirror sites should be mentioned more than only once. Perhaps an extra paragraph like the following would help:
Another Point are the official patches. IMO we should mention http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/ together with a little note: "When we have patches to a minor bug or two, or features which we haven't yet included in a new release, we will put them in the patches subdirectory so people can get access to it before we roll another complete release."[1]
Perhaps a short note in the top section. But there is rarely anything interesting in the patches directory.
oh, btw the 2.0 paragraph praises 2.0.36 as the best available version instead of 2.0.43. The headline, the text and the check-for-patches-link are wrong.
Yep, thanks, I copied my text from a non-updated version of the dist/README.html. I'll fix that.
Joshua.
