At 09:42 PM 10/31/2002, Chris Taylor wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >> No good solution. But *if* this is the only error (HTTP/0.9 >> responses in reaction to HTTP over HTTPS), I'd ask if I could get a >> few +1's so I can proceed with the effort (on to the SSL write >> BIO, then back to addressing the HTTP over HTTPS fooness.) > >FWIW, I think it'd be better if you continue revamping the SSL so >it's generally better, and THEN sort the nasty bug. Although the >solution to the bug may be complex, I think that the bug itself is >fairly minor. HTTP/0.9 isn't all too common these days as far as I'm >aware. >+1 from me.
Out of curiosity, had you applied and stressed the new patch? My reason for going on is that HTTP to the HTTPD port really doesn't quite demand a reasonable reaction from the server. We just happen to be flexible enough to provide one. But it's the error case, and I'd rather keep licking these 'ssl falls down under load' issues till those are resolved. Bill
