At 10:17 AM 11/14/2002, you wrote: >*or after tagging 2.0.44; that distinction isn't important to me; I >just want to get the ball rolling to move it out of experimental; >OtherBill, if a tag is still imminent, then it will definitely move >*AFTER* 2.0.44; there is no need to complicate matters;
Well, Sander is thinking about doing this tag. However, Jeff, go ahead and move 'em ... +1 here! >This module has been used successfully by a number of people in the >time that it has been available in experimental. I think it is time >to make it supported and available for --enable-modules=most so that >it is present in a binbuild for Unix. > >Currently there are two open PRs for mod_ext_filter: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 > (PDF generated in a filter not handled properly by IE; probably an > IE issue, since we would chunk the response and a MS KnowledgeBase > article says that IE requires a Content-Length header to deal with > PDFs properly) > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14016 > (ActiveState Perl CGI not seeing eof on stdin; whether or not this > is a mod_ext_filter problem, we build mod_ext_filter by default on > Win32 anyway) > >Is anyone against moving it to modules/filters for 2.0.stable? Absolutely no objection. I'll take a look at that later bug today [since it impacts things several ways.]
