> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Huh? No way. We're all adults here. If someone commits something > > that you are uncomfortable with, bring it up on the list. There's > > no reason for any ASF project to be R-T-C, IMHO. Our voting > > rules are sufficient enough to protect against bogus commits to > > stable or "maintenance" trees. > > Agreed.
Ditto. > > > > + * The 'modules/experimental' tree will evaporate soon. Anything > > > + in the development branch should be located under it's eventual > > > + home (such as modules/cache/.) > > > > There's no reason to remove this from the 2.0 releases. They are > > experimental not matter way, and if someone grabs a 2.0 tarball and > > wants to start hacking on experimental stuff, all the better! > > -1 to removing them from 2.0. Yep, I agree. Bill
