At 11:27 AM 12/2/2002, Brad Nicholes wrote: >Any reason why the changes to the following source file should not be added to the >2.0.44 branch? > >modules/experimental/util_ldap.c
That patch looks good... committed. >modules/experimental/util_ldap.dsp And this patch was very bad. Already reverted until someone reviews the win32 ldap API patch submission. Unless everyone feels that it just 'makes sense', but there are still the apr-util patches to contend with. Bill
