> From: Andr� Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 07 December 2002 12:13

> * Sander Striker wrote:
>
>> I tagged the 2.0 tree just yet as STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE1 in an
>> attempt to get the 2.0.44 show on the road.  Please test and
>> point out any problems.
>
> ehm perhaps a silly question: what apr, apr-util and apr-iconv will be
> used? HEAD?

The ones tagged with STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE1, which is typically HEAD, yes.

*checks* Ah, I forgot to tag apr*, doing so right now.

Sander

Reply via email to