> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:08 AM
> At 11:46 AM 10/15/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [snip] > >The second is SSL upgrade. I have the patches, they haven't been > >committed yet. I have attached them at the bottom of this message. The > >reason they haven't been committed, is that I don't have a client to test > >them with, and I haven't had time to create one. The responses are > >correct I have checked them in plain text. The place that bugs most > >likely exist, is the actual upgrade code that does the handshake. This is > >an important feature, and I would really like to see it in 2.0. > > I see a couple of very important aspects to this patch: [...] > My proposed solution is to review the patch and apply it to cvs HEAD. Get it > committed. Of course there are no test suites right now, and there won't be > for a little while yet. But once the code exists, it will be simpler to keep the > SSL upgrade facility maintained, and debug it as the clients become available > (most especially, libwww exercises through perl-framework.) > > Any disagreement? Not from me. +1 on committing it. Sander
