Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > --On Saturday, January 11, 2003 8:07 PM +1100 Stas Bekman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> ap_finalize_request_protocol covers all the other cases, by > >> checking r->sent_eos. My question is why not always add the eos in > >> ap_finalize_request_protocol()? > > ap_finalize_request_protocol() is a last resort to ensure that even > > with a faulty handler an EOS is sent down the chain. But, if an EOS > > is already sent, it is illegal to send another. -- justin > > Thanks Justin, > > Does that mean that mod_status, mod_info and other standard generator > handlers should be changed to send eos to be proper?
I think it is inaccurate to say that it is a "faulty handler" which doesn't send down an EOS bucket. Some handler using the simplest API (ap_rwrite() et al) doesn't know about EOS buckets and isn't expected to do something explicit to send one. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
