At 10:50 AM 2/22/2003, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>Of course for 2.1, but also for 2.0 as well... Right now, SSLMutex
>is pretty binary :)
Only one observation below, otherwise ++1 for both 2.0 and 2.1 customers
(Jim and I recently spent a week fighting solaris 9 pthread mutexes, extra
backup options are *always* goodness!)
> else {
> return apr_pstrcat(cmd->pool, "Invalid SSLMutex argument ",
>- arg, NULL);
>+ arg, " (", ssl_valid_ssl_mutex_string, ")", NULL);
the idea here was most cool, but I'd add to the "(" comment that
>+ arg, " (options valid on this platform are: ",
>+ ssl_valid_ssl_mutex_string, ")", NULL);
Bill
